|
Newsletter: April 2009 |
|
EuropeanIssuers in Vienna Aktienforum’s anniversary - 1 April ‘09 For the pictures of the event, click here. Works in progress General Meetings Market Standards |
Dear reader, The spring of 2009 came with a considerable number of new regulatory initiatives, many of them brought about by the financial crisis. The seriousness of the crisis calls for swift measures, hence there was only limited time for EuropeanIssuers to act and react, consult with its members and take stance on the various regulatory proposals. The fact that we issued eight position papers since our last newsletter of February is certainly illustrative of the speed things have been dealt with lately. While some proposals of these regulations are about to be formally adopted, for instance the proposed regulation on credit rating agencies, others are still in the conceptual phase, for instance the European Commission’s consultation on the possible harmonisation of securities law. I draw your attention in particular to the latter consultation as it will be the basis of a possible future Directive. It will address essential issues for securities issuers such as the choice of location for the securities issuance account, but also the role of custodians in the processing of corporate actions. For sure, an issue to be very closely and actively followed! Despite the unusually heavy workload, we made time to meet with our members: we had our Annual General Meeting plus a Legal Committee Conference and a Board meeting in Vienna in the first days of April, all meetings kindly hosted by our member Aktienforum. Together we celebrated the anniversary of this Austrian association that can look back at twenty years of successfully promoting the interests of issuers! Enjoy your reading, Dorien Fransens Latest News Latest Positions EuropeanIssuers in Vienna Works in progress Calendar![]() Latest News 20/04/09 – EuropeanIssuers successful in amending the proposed Regulation on CRAs EuropeanIssuers successfully lobbied some amendments made by the Economic and Monetary Committee (ECON) of the European Parliament to the proposal for a Regulation on Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs). http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=news,newsflash&id=125 20/04/09 - COM call for evidence on review of Market Abuse Directive The European Commission (COM) launched a call for evidence on the review of the application of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD), including some preliminary findings and proposals to improve and simplify the Directive. http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=news,newsflash&id=126 12/03/09 IOSCO code on CRAs IOSCO (International Organisation of Securities Commissions) published the results of its review of the implementation by CRAs (Credit Rating Agencies) of IOSCO’s Code of Conduct. http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=news,newsflash&id=118 04/03/04 – COM Communication to European Council supports reform based on de Larosière Report. In its Communication to the European Council summit on 19-20 March, the European Commission (COM) unveils a comprehensive reform of the financial system based on the de Larosière Report. http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=news,newsflash&id=115 26/02/09 COM proposes to abolish accounting requirements for micro enterprises The European Commission (COM) has put forward a proposal to allow Member States to completely abolish financial reporting obligations for the EU’s smallest companies. http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=news,newsflash&id=113 26/02/09 COM Consultation on the Review of the Fourth and Seventh Company Law Directives The Consultation aims at raising issues related to the modernisation and simplification of the Accounting Directives (78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC). http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=news,newsflash&id=114 25/02/09 – The de Larosière Group Global Report is published The much expected report from the de Larosière Group was published on 25/02/09. Its recommendations on the future supervision in Europe should model an overall EU review of the regulatory and supervisory framework for financial markets. http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=news,newsflash&id=111 ![]() Latest Positions IASCF Constitution Review - IASB Consultation Response dated 15 April 2009 to the IASB Consultation of December 2008 on the review of the constitution of IASBC - Identifying issues for part 2 of the review. EuropeanIssuers points out that: - The accountability of the IASB should be enhanced, in particular towards the Trustees - The Monitoring Body should have international organisations and representatives of authorities supervising financial institutions as members - The agenda setting of IASB ought to be improved - There should be a 2 year period between adoption and application of provisions - Amendments to provisions may not be applied retroactively http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=positions&id=181 COM Consultation - Financial Markets Supervision Response dated 15 April 2009 to the COM Consultation of 10 March 2009 on financial markets supervision concerning its communication of 4 March 2009 and the de Larosière report. EuropeanIssuers: -Find necessary that EU supervisory authorities be accountable to EP and have their competences distinguished from those of COM -Ask for involvement of business community in standing committees of EU supervisory authorities and in decision making processes -Suggest that rules applying to the financial sector should not be generalised/extended to issuers in general -Propose examining investigation and sanction regimes at EU level and their link with supervisory competences at national level -Consider that EU supervisory authorities should only take binding technical decisions applicable to individual companies when the latter are supervised by a college of national supervisors -Ask for elimination of national exceptions in EU sphere of competence -Consider fundamental to involve market actors in drafting interpretations at EU level -Favour a revision of “the mark-to-market principle” -Doubt about the relevance of revising the issuer-pays model for CRAs. http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=positions&id=179 Executive Directors Remuneration - ECG Statement Comments dated 16 April 2009 on the European Corporate Governance Forum's Statement of 24 March 2009 concerning the main principles that should govern executive directors remuneration. EuropeanIssuers: - Is in favour of transparency requirements; - Considers that a vote on remuneration policy should be on request only of shareholders representing at least 25% of the total number of votes present or represented at the AGM - Proposes to avoid disclosing the calculation method of the variable part of remuneration for competition reasons - Believes remuneration issues should remain within the domain of soft law to allow flexibility while preserving good corporate governance principles http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=positions&id=180 COM proposal Regulation CRAs - EP amendments EuropeanIssuers' comments dated 10 April 2009 on the amendments by ECON in its Report of 1 April 2009 on the COM proposal for a Regulation on Credit Reting Agencies. EuropeanIssuers generally agree with the amendments adopted by the Economic and Monetary Committee (ECON) of the European Parliament to the Proposal for a Regulation on credit rating agencies. However we strongly oppose to the proposed recital 14a and to the proposed article 8a of the text adopted by ECON. These amendments: - Undermine the business secrecy rules - Facilitate external market abuses and insider trading - Reduce the quality of ratings EuropeanIssuers believe that business information should not be disseminated for the purpose of an external analysis without the explicit consent of the issuer. http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=positions&id=178 COM proposal - Simplification of mergers and divisions regime Comments dated 3 April 2009 on the COM Proposal of September 2008 for a modification of the third and the sixth company law Directives on domestic law mergers and divisions. EuropeanIssuers: - Supports the proposal of simplification of the publication and documentation duties provided it is an option for companies and not an obligation - Proposes that the waiver of management reporting requirements should be left as an option to Member States - Agrees with the proposed exemption of an accounting statement when half-year financial reports are published - Has doubts on the merit of the possibility of a waiver of an accounting statement subject to unanimous vote by shareholders - Agrees with the alignment of creditor protection rules with the provision of the 2nd Company Law Directive - Supports the proposed exemption of approval of a merger by the general meeting of the acquiring company only in cases of acquisition of a wholly owned subsidiary or of a subsidiary whose parent holds 90% of the shares. http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=positions&id=177 Prospectus Directive Review - COM Consultation Comments dated 12 March 2009 on the COM Proposal for a Directive amending the Prospectus Directive and background document of 9 January 2009. EuropeanIssuers: - Art 2(1)(e): agrees to extend the scope of qualified investors but asks clarification on the kind of placements covered by it; - Art 3(2): believes that where the issuer is exempted from the obligation to publish a prospectus, he should be exempted also to do so for the subsequent resale by intermediaries; - Suggests clarification of the meaning of “significant new factors”; - Asks for a harmonised time frame for the investor’s right to withdraw; - Advises to raise in a significant manner the threshold that triggers the prospectus obligation for offers; - Promotes the exemption from the publication of a prospectus for rights issues for existing shareholders with no right for the latter to sell the rights attached to the shares; - Proposes stricter timelines for notifications by authorities, including a tacit approval of the prospectus.
http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=positions&id=176 COM Consultation control structures in audit firms Comments dated 6 March 2009 on DG MARKT's Working Paper of December 2008 on control structures in audit firms and their consequences on the audit market. EuropeanIssuers sees a need for not reducing the current number and structures of the audit firms’ networks, but doubts that changing ownership rules might be effective to that end. Capital is not the main reason causing the concentration on the audit market. Potential barriers to market entry lie in the necessity for audit firms to have: (a) international coverage; (b) expertise suited to the size, complexity and diversity of business situations; (c) a decent number of audit staff and (d) good reputation as perceived by investors, as users of financial statements. It is questionable whether the concentration is a problem of supply or of demand in the audit industry. In some instances also the regulation could be one of the causes of oligopoly in the market.
http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=positions&id=175 CESR Consultation non-equity markets transparency Response dated 5 March 2009 to CESR's Call for evidence of 19 December 2008 on the transparency of non-equity markets. EuropeanIssuers strongly support the introduction of a regulatory system of post trade transparency on corporate bonds; In normal market conditions, besides protecting investors and providing them with the opportunity to trade bonds at a lower cost, this system may facilitate a cheaper access to funding for a whole range of issuers; For some issuers (small, low rated), the transparency regime may even open this opportunity for the first time; We do not believe that a regulatory system of post trade transparency would have help in any material way to contain, or even prevent, the current financial crisis; Because of interplay of private and public interest, we do not believe that free market forces may achieve an optimal amount of post trade transparency through self regulation; We would, then, welcome the introduction of a regulatory system of post trade transparency requirements; the experience of TRACE should be closely looked at as a working basis.
http://www.europeanissuers.eu/en/?inc=page&pageid=positions&id=174 ![]() Calendar 27/04/2009 EcoDa Annual Conference - Brussels EcoDa's annual conference will focus this year on "The Boardroom's response to the crisis". The conference will be held at the Residence Palace in Brussels from 14h to 18h. For more details contact ecoDa at aida.simil@ecoda.org. 29/04/2009 CAJWG meeting - London Meeting of the Corporate Actions Joint Working Group, working on the Giovannini private sector barrier 3. 30/04/2009 JWGGM Meeting - London Meeting of the Joint Working Group on General Meetings, working on the standardisation of General Meeting communications and voting instructions (Giovannini Barrier 3). 07/05/2009 Conference on EU Financial Supervision - Brussels The European Commission will be holding a high level conference entitled "Towards a new supervisory architecture in Europe”. The conference comes in the framework of the consultation process on the future of EU financial supervision. It shall provide the Commission with suggestions on its policy proposals. For information about the conference click here. 28/05/2009 28/05 & 29/05 JWGGM Meeting - Brussels Meeting of the Joint Working Group on General Meetings, working on the standardisation of General Meeting communications and voting instructions (Giovannini Barrier 3). |
Copyright © 2009 - EuropeanIssuers
|
|